Awareness to the dangerous side-effects and deadly consequences of vaccines is ompilation of information concerning mercury in vaccines, their link to autism, other vaccine controversies, and the nationwide hoax that vaccines are mandatory.
State Attorney Admits No Law Makes Vaccines Mandatory charges against hundreds of parents in a county just outside Washington D.C. for failing to allow their children to be vaccinated admitted yesterday on a national radio show that there is no law that mandates any vaccine, despite a Fox News report falsely claiming otherwise.
No Law Says Parents Have To Get Their Children Vaccinated once again engaging in mass public deception by claiming that vaccines for children are mandated by law and that parents will go to jail if kids do not take their shots. In reality, there is no law that says you have to vaccinate your children and waiver forms for personal or religious exemptions are freely available. VACCINE EXEMPTION FORMS BY STATE AND COUNTRY Parents Must Immunize Their Children Or Go To Jail appear in circuit court this Saturday where health workers will immediately force them to receive required shots. Parents who don't bring their children to court for the shots are to be jailed.
Vaccination - The Hidden Truth documentary Vaccination - The Hidden Truth (1998) where fifteen people , including Dr. Viera Scheibner (a PhD researcher), five medical doctors, and other researchers, reveal what is really going on in relation to illness and vaccines. Ironically, the important facts come from orthodox medicine's own peer-reviewed research. With so much government and medical promotion of vaccination for prevention of disease, the video is clearly devoted to presenting the other side of the issue that parents and others are not being told. The result is a damning account of the ineffectiveness of vaccines and their often harmful effects.
Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda and autism as well its connections to “National Security Study Memorandum 200”; for population control. Showing its shocking connections to today’s G.A.V.I. Are powerful forces really trying to help the poor people or could it be for another agenda; the sterilization of the poor? This is an upsetting video, so brace yourself. Cheryl Hall: Vaccine Reactions & Medical Cover-Ups who was told by doctors that she was mandated to take another tetanus shot even though she had already taken the vaccine five years earlier. A nurse forcefully injected Hall against her will - but the shot was misplaced and went directly to her nervous system, causing seizures, convulsions, partial paralysis and blindness.
Alex Jones discussion the dangers of vaccines and why rates of autism are exploding in the U.S.
Mercury is still being added to vaccines at completely unsafe levels considering the fact that it is a known neuro-toxin. A recent study undertaken by the University of Calgary unveiled concrete evidence that mercury ions alter the cell-membrane of developing neurons in babies and young children, directly contributing to autism.
Mercury is good for you claims bizarre TV news report. Mercury in Flu Vaccinations five times the CDC's safe level reccomendation Bush To Veto Ban On Mercury In Vaccines Mercury in Childhood Vaccines: What Did the Government Know? New York bans mercury in vaccines Study Shows Decline in Neurodevelopmental Disorders After Removal of Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines New study links mercury to autism New England families sue over mercury in childhood vaccines Michael Wagnitz: Research supports mercury-autism link
Nationwide Revolt Against Dangerous Vaccines Accelerates revolt against unnecessary, untested and dangerous vaccines as CDC records show a growing amount of religious exemptions on vaccine forms, following a media blitz by Jenny McCarthy in which she blamed a vaccine for causing her son's autism.
Jenny McCarthy discusses her book and the link between autism and vaccines on The View, ABC's flagship daytime show. Actress and model Jenny McCarthy's appearance on the Oprah Winfrey show and numerous other prime time TV programs has spurred women to seriously investigate the link between autism in babies and young children and vaccinations.
Clip from Larry King Live with Jenny McCarthy
Dr Dan Speaks on Autism on the Oprah Winfrey Show about Autism, Dr Daniel Dantini, a renowned researcher on delayed food allergies, decided to elaborate on his own theories.
Dr. Mary Megson Speaks on Autism Epidemic and Vaccines on the Autism Epidemic and its relation to the US Vaccination program and her treatments to help reverse autism at Press Conference after Mercury-free Vaccine Rally outside the CDC in Atlanta, Ga on 6/8/2007.
Moms Against Mercury WB 22 News. Polio cases jump in Pakistan as clerics declare
No Law To Mandate Dangerous, Untested HPV Vaccine areas of the country that the HPV vaccine, which experts have slammed as untested and has already been linked to dangerous side-effects, is now the law and young girls must take it. Merck Pharmaceuticals are set to capitalize on this fraud by making obscene profits from a crony deal with Governor Rick Perry, while children are put at risk.
Alex Jones On The "Mandatory" Vaccination Hoax they are mandatory. Shot forced on newborn over parents' objections Absurd Vaccine Marketing -- Cervical Cancer Vaccinations for Boys Merck Ends Push for Mandatory Shots for Girls An AIDS vaccine in your cereal? It could really happen
Vaccines and drugs that are not stringently tested and are instead foisted upon populations for the purposes of making obscene profits have a clear history of deadly consequences. Consider the case of Bayer Pharmaceuticals, who deliberately dumped a vaccine that was known to be contaminated with AIDS virus on the European and Latin American market after it killed people in America. Thousands died from an action that the U.S. government allowed to happen through the FDA. Vaccine officials knew about MMR risks SV40, Polio Vaccine, and Cancer: Now Beyond Coincidence? Polio Vaccines Are Causing Cancer Officials say drug caused Nigeria polio Contaminated vaccine may cause cancer Why You Should Avoid Taking Vaccines Row over autism link to vaccines Polio Vaccine Contaminated With Cancer Given to Millions of Americans The AIDS virus: Made in the USA? Russian Prosecutors Launch Probe Into Vaccine Tests on Children Three people die after receiving flu vaccinations Flu shot left executive paralyzed $75000 Offered For MD to Publicly Drink Vaccine Additives Pentagon restarting mass vaccinations despite health fears UK Government In Secret Payments For Childhood Vaccine Damage The needle and the damage done External links to articles about vaccine dangers Meningitis vaccinations 'blamed' for rise in deaths US Military Finds That Anthrax Shots May Cause Birth Defects Kenyan Nobel peace laureate claims AIDS virus deliberately created
|
|
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Vaccine the deadly cure
12/06/08
| Corporations Plan To Pull Plug On The Free Internet Web users naive about agenda to turn Internet into regulated cable TV model |
Paul Joseph Watson |
The Internet is the last true unregulated outpost of freedom of
speech but moves are afoot to stifle, suffocate, control and eventually
pull the plug on the world wide web as we know it. These threats are
not hidden nor are they hard to deduce and yet a significant number of Internet users remain naive as to their scope.
Despite many questioning the authenticity of a report that claimed ISP's had resolved to restrict the Internet to a TV-like subscription model where users will be forced to pay to visit selected corporate websites by 2012, while others will be blocked, the march towards regulation of the web is clear and documented.
We have been warning about the plan to let the old Internet die and replace it with a restricted and controlled Internet 2 for years. In 2006, we published an article about how the RIAA were attempting to broaden intellectual property distinctions to a point whereby merely linking to external content is judged as copyright infringement.
At the time, the article was met with a mixed response. Many were aware of the imminent dangers that threaten to change the face of the Internet but others were more hostile to the supposition that the world wide web could be devastated by landmark copyright case rulings as well as plans to develop "Internet 2."
Some accused us of yellow journalism and scaremongering yet the warning that the Elektra vs. Barker case could criminalize the very mechanism that characterizes the Internet was not concocted by Alex Jones or Paul Joseph Watson, it was a statement made by the very lawyer fighting the case, Ray Beckerman.
It was a danger also reported on by one of the UK's biggest technology news websites, the Inquirer, which also highlighted the frightening development in an article entitled, RIAA wants the Internet shut down.
The RIAA's argument was that defendant Tenise Barker downloaded music files and made them available for distribution by placing them in a shared folder. Though Barker paid for the files and downloaded them legally, and the files were not copied by anyone, the RIAA's motion states that simply making the files available constitutes copyright infringement.
As Beckerman points out, the entire Internet is nothing more than a giant network of hyperlinks making files 'available' to other people. If we link to CNN.com, we are making the file that constitutes the CNN homepage 'available' to other users. We don't own the copyright to any of CNN's material therefore if the RIAA's argument is accepted, by simply making that CNN file available from our website, even if no one clicks on the link, we are committing a breach of copyright.
At no point in our article did we suggest that the ruling definitely would shut down the Internet, we highlighted the fact that hundreds of transnational corporations like Amazon.com who solely rely on Internet trade would scream bloody murder. But what the ruling would grease the skids for is the move towards a strictly regulated Internet whereby government permission would be required to run a website and that website would be subject to censoring and deletion if it violated any "terms of use."
This wouldn't be much of a problem to giant transnational corporations, because their websites would remain accessible for everyone. Yet for thousands of political websites and blogs, the plug could be effectively pulled.
After a long legal fight, Elektra vs. Barker was decided largely in Elektra's favor, after a federal judge essentially validated the RIAA's position that having songs available in a KaZaA shared folder violates the distribution right under the Copyright Act.
The example that we cite in discussing what life would be like under "Internet 2" was that running a blog would be like having a You Tube account - any politically sensitive or controversial information that the owners dislike would immediately be removed as it is frequently on You Tube.
In addition, the slide towards a licensed Internet that will be sold using fear of identity and credit card fraud could lead to mandatory biometric thumb or finger scanning simply to access the world wide web.
This is hardly a stretch of the imagination, since numerous public services and functions of society are increasingly accessible only through providing some form of biometric identification. Credit passes for travel, ATM terminals and access to theme parks like Disneyland are just a few of the many services we use that are shifting towards mandatory biometric gatekeeping.
Furthermore, Pay By Touch Online and other companies have already developed and launched keyboard biometric finger scanning terminals that require users to submit their biometric print before they can access the Internet or buy online.
Piggybacking the net neutrality debate, Internet 2 is being shaped to replace the old Internet, which will be allowed to self-destruct as it labors under the pressures of being relegated to slower and slower pipes and users will simply desert a painstaking system.
More than two years ago in an article entitled, The End of the Internet?, The Nation magazine reported,
"The nation's largest telephone and cable companies are crafting an alarming set of strategies that would transform the free, open and nondiscriminatory Internet of today to a privately run and branded service that would charge a fee for virtually everything we do online."
"Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers--would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out."
Internet 2 is being billed as the next generation of the world wide web and it has already set global speed records in terms of data transfer, far outstripping the old Internet.
One of the fathers of the Internet, David Clark, who served as chief protocol architect for the government's internet development initiative in the 1980s, has been given $200,000 by the National Science Foundation to covertly work on a "whole new infrastructure to replace today's global network," according to Wired Magazine.
Clark has vowed to create a "brave new world" in designing the new Internet, characterizing what he wanted for the new network to be "a coherent security architecture."
Dovetailing the onset of Internet 2 are government propaganda campaigns to demonize the existing Internet as a wild backwater for hate crime, child pornography and a terrorist recruiting ground.
Establishment kingpins and their cheerleaders have increased their level of vitriolic rhetoric against the Internet in recent years , as legislation in both the U.S. and Europe to regulate, stifle and license the Internet moves forward.
The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.
In addition, the Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror.
In an October 2006 speech, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills."
Chertoff pledged to dispatch Homeland Security agents to local police departments in order to aid in the apprehension of domestic terrorists who use the Internet as a political tool.
The European Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the Internet to spread propaganda.
The dangers to the freedom and very existence of the Internet as we know it are all too real and the way to counteract these developments is to get involved and get the word out. Simply burying our heads in the sand and being apathetic and naive about the threat is only going to aid those who wish to see the last outpost of freedom of speech shut off forever.
------------------------------------
Monday, June 5, 2006
Bluetooth headsets gain popularity and
raise health concerns
It’s not surprising to see more and
more Bluetooth® devices out and about
nowadays, literally. Some have them in
their PDAs. Now, with the availability of
the wireless headset, you can walk into any
mall or megamart, and chances are you’ll
see at least a handful of people talking
into thin air with those wireless ear pieces
barely an inch from their brains.
Last year, Bluetooth headsets alone
gained 153 percent in worldwide sales.
The convenience of the hands free set had
finally gone cordless, and consumers got
their hands on them as fast as they could.
The irony comes when some people
purchase a Bluetooth headset in order to get
away from putting the cell phone to their
ears. Media reports about the dangers of
cell phone antennae causing brain tumors
have circulated since their introduction of
the mobile devices in the 1980s.
Critics of wireless devices advised
minimal use of cell phones and /or the use
of wired headsets to get the phones away
from the head. But the advent of Bluetooth
took the idea of the headset and made it
more convenient by taking away the wire.
What few people really understand is
that, energetically speaking, a Bluetooth
headset is not really much better than
keeping the phone receiver to the ear.
Like Wi-Fi, or wireless fidelity which was
covered in the recent Issue 8 of the KIMA
Journal, Bluetooth uses digital signals to
communicate between the headset and a
Bluetooth-enabled cell phone. Bluetooth
just covers a smaller distance than wi-fi,
whose signals can cover an area as large
as coffee shop and even as large as the
downtown district of a major metropolitan
city.
So when you receive a call on your
Bluetooth-enabled cell phone, the phone
relays a signal to the wireless headset. In
essence, the headset is an antenna right
on your ear that receives the signals. And
like all wireless devices, the stronger a
signal, the more “fidelity” or accurately
reproduced the information is, such as the
sound quality of a phone call.
From the energetic standpoint, this kind
of close-range, man made electromagnetic
frequencies, or EMFs, emitted from the
wireless devices is detrimental to the human
body’s bioelectrical systems. Harmful
EMFs inhibit the body’s natural energy
flow. Inhibited energy flow can lead to
incoherence, which can lead to congestion.
Pain is a symptom of the congested energy,
and when that isn’t properly addressed,
they can lead to almost every disease
in existence, from weight gain to brain
tumors.
Are we saying that man made EMFs are
the sole cause of these diseases? Of course
not. But EMFs do contribute to energy
congestion, which directly leads to health
problems.
But this is a difficult concept to convey
to a public that either doesn’t accept the
science of bioelectrical energy, doesn’t
know about it or doesn’t care. As long as
they feel all right, then everything is okay.
But inhibitions on the bioelectrical
systems are difficult to detect by just
“feeling.” Someone can be affected by
EMFs from wireless devices for many
years before ever experiencing any serious
symptoms. By the time a brain tumor is
detected, the damage has already been
done.
Luckily, The KI Method® can work
through the damages the EMFs and
wireless devices can cause, but only if a
person is willing to work to improve his or
her health. Pulse reading can find which
pathways are congested and TKM® can
work naturally and non-evasively to release
the congestion and re-establish the proper
flow of bioelectrical energy.
Or, the other logical solution would be
to not use wireless devices and if you must
use them, to use them sparingly and keep
them away from your body when not in
use.
There is no doubt that Bluetooth is
convenient. However, the convenience is
not worth the health risks.
© 2006 King Institute, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
